|
July, 2005
George Bush is the back-slapping, joke-telling, nickname-giving
antithesis of the dour Richard Nixon. But his administration
is showing itself to be crafted after the same secrets-protecting
and enemies-listing of 1974’s Paranoia Presidency.
The current flap over whether Karl Rove did or did not
out Valerie Plame is academically interesting, but no
one is
surprised that Rove, Bush's #1 White House operative, would
be capable of such a thing. This week’s revelations
of career officer dismay within the Pentagon concerning our
definition of torture is greeted more with a knowing
nod than disbelief. Bush’s preparation of a recess-appointment
for the controversial John Bolton would be an outrage in
the Clinton administration but hardly gets noticed in
this one. A war based on increasing evidence of false pretenses?
So, what else is new?
The same level of accepting the unacceptable surrounds
this presidency as Nixon's.
The difference is, Nixon was not a friendly guy. Nobody
wanted to go quail-hunting or play a round of golf with Tricky
Dick.
His twice-daily need to shave epitomized the dark side of
a dark man and he took us many places, most of them falsely
labeled under the most dangerous of presidential paranoias,
the distrust of the nation’s citizenry. He paid the
price, impeachment and dishonor.
The difference is a lesson in jocksmanship. Bush won’t
pay the price, not because he hasn’t lied, kept enemies-lists,
relied on henchmen like Rove, been secretive, stonewalled
investigations or surrounded himself with crooks . . . he
won’t pay the price because we like him better
than Nixon. It's come down to that. Jocksmanship constantly failed
the stiff and remote Nixon, but serves the casual, leg-over-the-golf-cart
Bush famously.
He may be all hat and no cattle, the cowboy who can’t
ride a horse, but the image is right for the times . . .
a Marlboro Man, no matter that smoking causes cancer.
We will survive this attack on integrity in government.
We always survive such lapses and would have survived Nixon
had he not been run out of office. What will not survive
is the matter of political legacy and legacy is especially
important to this president. When one lacks an essential
frame of ethical reference, operating instead on efficacy,
the importance of history and one’s place in it becomes
an end in itself. One cannot hope for legacy by locking up
the records because legacy is a forever thing and the Freedom
of Information Act unlocks all locks eventually.
Great leaders persuade rather than prevaricate, letting
history take care of itself. Statesmen bring together rather
than
drive apart, no matter the difficulty, whatever the time
required, allowing history the freedom of its own judgment.
Small hearted and small-minded men use secrecy as a weapon,
create the big lie as a substitute to argument, list and
forever denigrate their perceived enemies, bend the intent
of law when it doesn’t suit them, hire surrogates to
fight their battles and deny access to their public records.
Richard Nixon was a small-hearted and small-minded man.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |