|
September, 2002
It seems few in this nation share the administration blood-lust
for war with Iraq but George Bush, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul
Wolfowitz and Condi Rice. The Five.
Not the Secretary of State, the
Congress, the United Nations or our allies. Certainly not the generals
who must win this one, if winning is even a relevant or obtainable
goal. Not the public, at least not as represented in growing editorial
opposition. Not even Henry Kissinger, that hawk-of-hawks, or the former
Bush, Sr. presidential advisors.
And one wonders why The Five are
so adamant, when any number of other Muslim or Arab countries pose
the greater threat to American security.
- Pakistan already has nuclear weapons and continues as the
refuge of choice for al Qaeda.
- Saudi Arabia produced
(by way of citizenship)15 of the 19 September 11th terrorists and
continues to this day to be the major financial backer of
al Qaeda.
- The bin Laden family was
flown out of the US immediately after planes were once again allowed
to fly, by private Royal Family aircraft, without submitting
to a requested FBI interview.
- Osama bin Laden is himself
a Saudi citizen.
Yet neither Pakistan or Saudi Arabia
seems to pose the threat the Bush administration attributes to
Iraq.
The President tells us an Iraq
war will be as easily won as Afghanistan. We have won
precious little in Afghanistan. The Taliban has been hurt and dispersed,
but hardly defeated and coalesces even now for a renewal of hostilities.
The newly formed government dares not venture outside Kabul. What liberation,
what success has been achieved? Afghanistan, if we are to prevail, will
(like Bosnia) require 20 years of armed occupation and untold billions
in capital improvement. The military and political conditions there
are coming apart in our hands even now.
Yet The Five conspire, five people
absolutely determined to take us to war in Iraq.
Well, then let them make their
case to the American public.
They have not yet made their
case. Despotism in Iraq is not a case. Despots abound in the
Middle East. The possibility of Iraqi terrorist support is not a
case, compared with the reality of terrorist support in Pakistan,
Yemen, Egypt, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Nuclear possibility is not a
case, considering nuclear reality in Pakistan. Allegations
are not enough. Indeed, unless American society is prepared to become
a pariah throughout the world, the Bush doctrine of preemptive war must
not stand.
Preemptive war has no precedence
in our history. During the forty years of standoff between Soviet and
American interests, preemptive war was never an acknowledged possibility.
Now that mutual annihilation is no longer a threat to America since
the fall of communism, a doctrine of preemptive war shows us merely
as bullies, able and (worse yet) willing to extort and coerce. The
Promise of America throughout the world dies with such a doctrine.
If this tyranny of The Five is
allowed to prevail,
* The ensuing war is estimated
to cost $100 billion.
* Energy and gasoline prices
will soar.
* Iraq will certainly lob
scud missiles into Israel, because Israel has said it will respond militarily
this time, shattering fragile coalitions and bringing the entire Arab
world in on the side of Iraq.
* The already wounded American
economy will be required to absorb the costs of the war, as well as
the huge oil price increases. Either would be too great a load in its
present weakness. Taken together, the market will topple from its knees
to flat-on-its-back.
* House-by-house fighting
in Baghdad will be a certainty (read Black Hawk Down).
* Afghanistan (already destabilizing)
will collapse into chaos.
* Given that scenario, nuclear
Pakistan cannot be relied upon to remain neutral.
* Saddam, in the his last
moments will destroy the already mined oilfields, as he did in Kuwait,
leaving a smoking, burning pile of wreckage across Iraq.
* And thus, Osama bin Laden
will have achieved all of his stated goals to bring the Muslim-Christian
world into a final and devastating mutual Crusade.
This war is not about terrorism,
not about nuclear capability, not about germ warfare, civil
abuse or the freedom of nations and peoples. It's about what it's always
been about, it's about oil, profit, control and power.
The difference is, that what
it's always been about has never before been established as a matter
of American foreign policy in the aggressive language of preemptive
strikes against any nation we perceive to be a threat. Regime change.
If the tyranny of The Five is allowed to stand, the historic world-view
of America will be seen as a lie and we will have become what
the Soviets always called us, Imperialists.
The American people are not
and have never been Imperialists!
American citizens, if they care
for their legacy of freedom, if they value the brilliance of their founding
principles (and principals), if they are unwilling to watch an inept,
uneducated, socially isolated president throw their legacy down a sewer,
must not let this tyranny of five prevail.
This is not a time for blind faith
in our government. It's a time to stand firm, to make ourselves heard,
to become involved in the democratic processes we take for granted.
The metaphoric barricades are no further than your own PC. Write your
government, your newspaper, your friends---they all have e-mail addresses.
If you don't write, join those who do, if by nothing else but your signature
or the forwarding of opinion.
And if I'm wrongheaded, write to
me (freeman@vol.cz).
But in any event, begin a dialog
so that we don't end up somewhere very far from our origins by the design
of a mere five people. This is not global warming, this is the global
integrity and reputation of our nation.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |