|
March, 2005
Claiming it’s wrong to do something while doing it
is disingenuous. Sometimes it’s against the law, unless
you are the law.
In a great disservice to our freedoms, Alberto
Gonzales, now that he is securely Attorney Generaled, defends
the practice of ‘extraordinary rendition.’ That’s
sending terrorist suspects to other countries for questioning,
usually with torture in mind and quite the reverse of his
congressional testimony before confirmation. He said in those
disingenuous days that renditions would not be made to countries
where it was “more likely than not’ that detainees
would be tortured.
More likely than not is a pretty subjective call, when you’re
sending prisoners to some of the most repressive and violent
regimes on the
planet. The official claim is that the threat of rendition
is a powerful tool interrogating suspects who fear rendition. I’ll
just bet it is!
So, if I have this straight, Alberto is playing semantic
games while terrorist suspects continue to be flown out of
American jurisdiction. Sort of like Chile in the seventies.
Augusto Pinochet ran a similar air service and the international
community is still trying to add up the ‘disappeared’ and
make him pay for it. No wonder America fears the establishment
of an International Tribunal and won’t play that game.
It is after all, somewhat messy and terribly inconvenient
to have to carry out various tortures and personal humiliations
within the rules.
Think about it.
On the other hand and taking the opposite position,
what are your options if it becomes your personal responsibility
to prevent who knows what by who knows whom? The
possibilities are infinite, the suspects many, the languages
unfamiliar,
the stakes as large as tall buildings and urban populations,
the instructions murky and the chain-of-command unclear.
The very air is fragrant with deniability. Thus is built
a pretty good case for ‘get these people out of
my jurisdiction and squeeze information from them like juice
from a lemon.’ Send them somewhere that Arabic
is understood, a place untraceable to me personally, that
doesn’t
give a tinker’s damn about niceties and have some results
(any results) on my desk by next week.
It works.
At least, if the absence of terrorist attacks on American
soil is any indication, it works. We prefer not to know the
details, but we’re personally glad as hell that it
works. We’re not collectively comfortable with various
infringements on prisoner rights, but what the hell were
they doing there anyway, we’re at war for chrissake.
So, I suspect that were Alberto Gonzales or Donald Rumsfeld
to sit down with you or me over a quiet drink and lay out
for us gruesome possibility against gruesome necessity, we
might say, “Well, Don, whatever you think” and “thanks
Al, for coming by.”
Closing the door, walking back
in to the still-crackling logs in our fireplace, we’d
(perhaps) sit in one of their still-warm chairs and muse
that theirs was an impossibly difficult job. We’d be
glad the ball was in their court, comforted that they knew
what to do with it when a blistering return came sizzling
down the backhand alley and way less sure of how to regard
their careful responses before Senate committees.
I don’t know how I personally feel about all that. I know that my commentary is more strictly constitutional
in the serenity of my office than when my heart pounds, feeling
a presence behind me at a late-night ATM. I understand that
our American openness trumps everyone else’s closed
societies and we pay a collective cost for that which we
are not always willing to pay individually. I have been mugged
and know the racing thought ‘just let me live through
this.’ I know the comfort of writing from safety can
make my snug and sometimes smug opinion repugnant to those
without a net. The expendable, the men and women who take
the fall, with the responsibility, the burden, the requirement to take bad choices and make the best of them and stand there
naked when it all goes to hell.
The ethical stand is almost always taken from safety and
yet that safety is oft times bought and paid for with blurred
ethics. It’s what makes statesmanship so rare.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |