|
March, 2005
Hewlett Packard has a new CEO named Mark Hurd and while
the level of enthusiasm is smiles all around at the Board
of Directors as well as Wall Street, one wonders about the
numbers.
Carly Fiorina’s exit package is still causing enough
turbulence to rock all incoming boats.
Does it seem strange to you that CEO salaries are often
dwarfed by the negotiated exit parachutes? It does to me.
It seems counter-productive to offer such a huge incentive
to get yourself fired. We knew about Carly’s $1.4 mil
salary, but the $42 million newspaper in which her severance
fish was wrapped came as a surprise. She was there a couple
years, screwed up the job and got thirty years pay for it.
Nice deal. Tidy for everyone but the investors.
Equally, and some would say democratically, we are not privy
to Mark’s getting-out-of-town money. But precedents
are set by such things and it’s hard to settle the
new guy into the chair without either coming up with similar
loot or making him (or her) feel neglected, out of sorts
and downright crabby. The first question on everyone’s
lips, from best friends to those who didn’t make the
cut, is not the signing package but the severance.
“Honey, I got the job.”
“
Great, sweetie. I knew you had it in you. What’s the
severance?”
Very important people go entirely through very
important lives, doing very important things and never accumulate anything
approaching a million, much less tens of millions. And of
course the exit money is an expense, which means it is deducted from what would otherwise be profit and that
which is not profit cannot be used for such otherwise useful purposes
as research and development, building new factories or that
most pleasant of all purposes, return on investment.
Return on investment are what Mark and Carly were hired
for in the first place, by a Board that (presumably) had
the best interests of their investors in mind at the time
of hiring. What then, could so abruptly turn them against
their advocacy of the investor when it came time to play
Good Night Ladies and dim the lights for the end of the dance?
Hush money, probably.
Go quietly money, without any mud-slinging and all that
nasty finger-pointing that might throw a little light on
how ill-advised the Board’s original insights had been.
Tipping the lady (or man) who somehow inconveniently ends
up in your hotel room at four in the morning (and then gets
noisy) is still the far wiser solution to calling the house
dick. In the non-corporate world there are a lot of names
by which this extortion is called, but none of them are severance
pay.
Not to second guess the Mark Hurd choice so early in the
honeymoon, or at all for that matter. His NCR credentials
are impeccable and he’s a hands-on manager type more
interested in the personnel than the personal. A good man
by all counts and even the rumor of his choice put HP stock
up 10%.
When Mark steps down from HP, let’s hope it’s
at a retirement party rather than a gunfight at the OK Corral.
HP’s Board has seemingly done a wise thing by bringing
Mark on board, but they’ve got a long way to go to
vindicate the $42 million decision to get Carly to go quietly.
And they've done damage to business credibility as well.
Like my old daddy said, Wall Street is made of the sheep
and those who shear the sheep.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |