|
August, 2005
WARNING: Reading this commentary may be injurious to your
perception of the United States Army, its traditions and
command structure.
General Kevin P. Byrnes, Commander of the
Army’s Training and Doctrine Command at Fort Monroe,
Virginia has been relieved of his command by order of the
Chief of Staff.
An Army spokesman said there was no record
in modern times of a four-star general being relieved, so
we’re seeing some history here, albeit probably a brief
history as the story appeared in my yesterday’s newspaper
and was gone today.
You may recall that General Douglas MacArthur
was famously relieved of command by President Harry Truman
during the Korean War for disobeying a direct Presidential
order. That circumstance was a history-making reinforcement
of the constitutional prerogative of civilian dominance over
the military. An eye-popping event that garnered worldwide
attention and further established our government as one that
brooks no political interference by our military.
So, this is an extremely serious charge, unprecedented
in recent history and it thoroughly trashes the legacy
of a
military commander with an otherwise outstanding and unblemished
record, whose planned retirement was a mere three months
away. No minor player, Byrnes command oversaw 33 Army Schools,
from basic training to the war colleges. The charge must
have been grave indeed.
The charge: Having an affair . . . with a civilian.
Wow!
I
guess the Army forgot all about Dwight Eisenhower having
an affair with his wartime
driver,
Kaye Summersby. Eisenhower, pictured at left (with Summersby
in the background) and looking particularly pleased with
himself, not only maintained his rank, he was twice elected
President.
So now we come at last to the hero of our story, General
Peter Shoomaker. Four stars on his shoulders (just like Byrnes),
Army Chief of Staff, the top guy, whose responsibilities
include: supervising the execution of Army policies, plans,
programs, and activities and assessing the performance of
Army commands in the execution of their assigned statutory
missions and functions.
Full plate, that's for sure. But you can bet that somewhere
in there among the ‘assessing of performances’ was
an opinion about relieving the first four-star in modern
history
of his command. Not an out-of-town hit, but an inside job.
After all, the pink-slip was carried out over his signature.
Tough place, the Army. But the old Army was at
least an honorouble place.
There are only eleven generals in the entire Army of four-star
rank. A pretty small club. One can but wonder how Pete feels
about crushing Bryan’s career, but hey, Bryan old
boy, no hard feelings.
The Army has been much criticized of late
for prisoner abuse scandals and accused of not going after
high ranking officers. Army officials said relieving
Byrnes was meant to show the public that the service takes
matters
of integrity seriously.
So an outdated definition of integrity
is a no-no, but dereliction of command duty is perfectly
okay. All those out-of-control kids at Gitmo and Abu
Ghraib that General Shoomaker claims were on their own is
a story
even the FBI can't bear to support without sticking their
fingers down their throats.
Just how does skewering Byrnes show anything about the Army
other than disloyalty, passing the buck and total incompetence
within the command structure?
On Kevin Byrnes’s watch
- No prisoners were abused
- No Iraqi general was beaten
to death zipped helplessly in a sleeping bag
- No Geneva
Conventions were broken
- No International Red Cross allegations
were covered up
- No blanket denials of responsibility were
made up and down the command chain
- No lies were told under
oath to Senate committees
- No crises in military morale
were generated
- No military esteem and honor was internationally
degraded, and finally
- No one in his command
buckled under to the civilian shattering of military
law
Every single one of the above disgraces to the reputation
of the United States Army occurred under the command of General
Peter Shoomaker.
Harry Truman’s buck stops on Shoomaker's desk.
There is no shame greater than making a scapegoat and whipping-boy
of a brother military officer for dereliction of one’s
own personal duty.
And once again, wearily again we are asked in this unendingly
agonizing drama, to follow the yellow-brick road.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |