|
March, 2003
Dalton Conley is associate professor of sociology
and director of the Center for Advanced Social Science Research at New
York University. I'm sure he's a nice guy. Sociologists, if
nothing else, mean to be nice guys.
Dalton looks deeply into his sociological crystal
ball and finds there, a plan to compensate black American families for
the 150 years of deprivation they presumably suffered from slavery. It's
not enough that we fought the bloodiest and most costly war (in terms
of white deaths) in our history in order to free them. Now, we're
going to pay them as well. $35,000 per black family by Conley's figures
and he reaches deep into his sociological bag to explain just how he arrived
at that number. Money is the healer in America, whether you spill a cup
of McDonalds coffee in your lap or your antecedents were slaves.
He argues that "the argument for reparations
lives on nearly 140 years later." I don't know who the argument
"lives on" with, other than among professors of sociology. It
certainly doesn't live on with me, although I'm white and my
ancestors were freed from their particular servitude by the Magna Charta.
That was some 600 years prior to the Civil War and I guess I'm too
late to sign up. Dalton's sociology probably has a statute of limitation.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but it seems
I remember taking America away from the American Indian tribes, decimating
them by the original biological warfare of smallpox-infected giveaway
blankets. Then, if memory serves me right, we abrogated treaty after treaty
with these Indian Nations and shuttled them off to one reservation after
another. The reason for this is that the American government kept on finding
valuable stuff on treaty reservations and as soon as valuable stuff was
discovered, the Indians had to move. Those who didn't move were massacred.
Indian society today is far more injured, more destroyed, more unjustly
treated than black culture.
But they've both been hurt by association
with white society, there's little doubt of that.
By Dalton's standards, I guess we give the
country back to the Indians. By government standards, if the past is any
measure, we'd merely give them the national debt.
Equitable restitution to Indians, Blacks, Holocaust
Jews, Palestinians, Vietnamese and (you name the injured party) cannot
be made with money. Attempting to pay our way out of our own historic
blunders, so everyone can feel good about themselves, is such a contrived
and useless solution that it makes me wonder if universities like New
York University can longer justify having departments of sociology at
all. Wrongheadedness is fast becoming institutionalized.
Achieving any sort of social progress in our country
or the world can only come from treating people as if they mattered. Paying
them proves they don't matter, except as an annoyance that we can
afford to fix, like paying for screens on windows in fly country. The
idiot woman who dumped coffee in her lap was paid off---an annoyance that
could be afforded---where is any hint of justice in that? All she could
do was blush deeply, take the money and run. Done, finished. My social
contract and obligation to you is settled, now get lost.
Indians, Blacks, Holocaust Jews, Palestinians
and other injured parties want a dialog about how they are perceived in
the world. They'll take care of their own making-of-livings, thank
you very much. They don't want condescension, they want to be taken
seriously.
If the white majority (and it's a thin majority
now) in the United States wants to restitute anything of value for the
crime of slavery, let them take Black America seriously as builders of
and contributors to American society, because they are. All else will
come from that. Blacks don't need $35,000 per family and a look-how-good-we've-been-to-you
smirk, they sorely need the equality of thought whites regularly give
to one another.
Wake up, Dalton, your condescension is showing.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |