|
March, 1998
It seems sometimes if we can't toss the drug dealer
in the slammer and throw away the key, we unmercifully clobber the common
thief. Frustrated by real crime, we we lash out at what is hardly crime
at all. Two items from my paper set me off in that philosophical direction
and it's a great ocean in which to sail---the wind seems always to be
up.
The first is the infamous ruling by Judge Jean
"Cookie" Rheinheimer, upholding a 26 year to life in prison
sentence that Kevin Weber picked up under California's 'three strike'
law. Life for stealing four chocolate chip cookies. The judge's nickname
isn't really Cookie, I laid that on her myself and apologize right now
for my lack of proper discipline before the bench. Many two-time losers
have been packed away for life for the most minor of crimes by the likes
of Judge Rheinheimer. So many in fact, that the Supreme Court in '96 held
that judges were allowed 'leniency' in the enforcement of three strike
sentences.
In the spirit of that leniency, the judge held
that Weber was 'typical of the defendent the people and legislature had
in mind' when they drafted the law. The prosecutor at Weber's hearing
to reduce his sentence added the incredible statement that "If we
wouldn't have had an audible alarm, we probably would have found money
stuffed in his pockets." Well, Al Capone probably was the head of
the Chicago prohibition mob as well, but in those days we didn't sentence
for 'probably.'
The second item catching my eagle-eye was the
revelation that our late president, Lyndon Johnson bugged the office and
phone of his vice-president, Hubert Humphrey. It seems ol' Lyndon was
scared to death that Hubert would part ways with him over the Vietnam
war---most everybody was at the time. Land o'goshen, that Hubert was a
wiley critter and might use it to run against him and that was reason
enough to bring in the FBI wiretappers.
The lovely part of that story is that the FBI
went ahead and did it with nary a ripple of conscience over law. It takes
a judge's order to tap a phone and ol' Lyndon could probably whistle up
a passel of judges on even his worst day, but he didn't even bother and
J. Edgar Hoover didn't trouble himself either. Those are crimes, either
one of which, by (take your pick) the President of the United States or
the Director of the FBI, outdistances stealing chocolate chip cookies
by a country mile. Even in a fixed horserace, illegal wiretapping comes
in first.
So it seems we're overfed these days on paranoia.
California becomes so outraged at criminals who get off time after time
after time, that they enact well meaning but flawed law, in order to pack
away for life any three-timer, poor idiot and seasoned criminal alike.
And I grant, you Kevin Weber may have been seasoned as spicily as any.
But the Supremes (the judges, not the singers) thought too many cookie
thieves were being put away and gave judges some leniency. For some reason
they preferred the word 'leniency' over 'sanity.' A bunch of convictions
came up for review after that ruling and Kevin's cookies were upheld.
Largely because presidents like LBJ and Nixon
ran over so many citizens, the Congress came up with its version of 'three
strikes,' a way to get the guys who couldn't be got. They called it a
Special Prosecutor and it runs neck and neck parallel to the California
example of the wrong law for the right reason or at least close to maybe
the right reason. As a result, too many cookie thieves are being hounded
from the party that's in by the party that's out. But neither side wants
to admit the flaw, because it will be their turn next time and then just
watch the fun.
In the meanwhile, we are subjected to an unending
national agony while Starr looks for Clinton's cookies, or at least some
crumbs, or the intent to keep flour in the cupboard, or . . .
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |