|
January 30, 2006
I’ve long argued for commercial principles in government
and so, a big grin continued to expand across my face as I read
Sarah Bridges’ Retailer Target Branches Out Into Police
Work piece in the Washington Post.
Most large retail operations have in-house ‘inventory
conservation enforcement’ programs of one kind or another,
a euphemism for making sure shoplifting and employee theft don’t
get out of hand. Target, the retailing giant, has just such a
department that’s been unusually strong and effective over
the years, building on latest technology as well as recruiting
top-level law enforcement officials to make it run.
And run it does, to the envy of such police entities as the FBI and police departments nationwide.
Robert J. Ulrich, Chairman and CEO at Target had one of those moments we’ve all had over breakfast,
when he read about a repeat offender walking out of a courtroom
because the judge wasn’t aware he had a record elsewhere
in the state.
The State was Minnesota and Target is headquartered
in Minneapolis. It turned out the man who was released raped
a woman the day after his dismissal and Ulrich was outraged.
He wanted to know how the guy got out of jail so fast and assigned
Nathan Garvis, Target's vice president of government affairs,
to find out.
It turned out that one branch of Minnesota law enforcement didn’t
have access to another agency's records. Uh huh, guess we’ve
all heard that one. City, county, state and federal criminal
record systems had different ways of entering data and couldn't
routinely share information. According to Garvis, "It
struck me that following repeat criminals was really an inventory-management
problem."
A eureka moment and confirmation of my prejudice. A government
agency would never think like that.
Unlike many competitors, who may have developed some degree
of technology in order to keep an eye on things, Target has been
called “a technology company masquerading as a retailer.” Be
that as it may, and somewhat tongue-in-cheek, there are those
who credit Target for teaching police departments that may have
been masquerading as law enforcement agencies. Target’s high profile helpings-out include
- A Houston arson-homicide in 2004, where a woman and two
children died in a fire.
- A bank robbery that the FBI brought
brought in to try to figure out who
the criminal was, who happened to have been videotaped. Target experts
made an
identification that led to conviction.
- Building a forensics lab for the
Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.
- Including FBI and
other agency officials in their corporate leadership programs
- Providing
various agencies with trucks filled with electronics and
other merchandise to lure criminals.
- Running programs for the
World Customs Organization to protect cargo with advanced
technical systems.
- Developing surveillance programs in various
cities to monitor high-crime areas.
That’s pretty impressive stuff.
Still, uncomfortable with
such close associations, Ernesto Dal Bó a professor at
Berkeley says, "It is a tricky issue when firms get too
close to government. There is no reason we need to say that anything
bad is happening, but we do need to watch." There’s
truth in that, no doubt. But commercial businesses run on a
different parameter than government agencies and that can be
refreshing.
In the matter of bringing Minnesota agencies together, Richard
Stanek, a former Minnesota public safety commissioner said in
the Post article, "This kind of thing had been
tried before. The extra thing that Target brought was neutrality
and mediation.
They physically brought the different arms of law enforcement
together and helped get us talking."
Neutrality and mediation--both huge problems in the reconfiguration
and database management upgrading at the FBI and within agencies
of the Homeland Security Agency. Turf Issues, hierarchies of
data access, who’s in charge where and who might be stepping
on someone else’s toes. If we have nothing else since 9-11,
we have toes, tens of thousands more toes.
It’s possible that some of them need stepping on.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |