|
September, 2005
In the unfortunate utterances department, Rep.
Tom Feeney (below right) of Florida alluded to suspension
of the Davis-Bacon Act by saying “Lots of people
in Louisiana are willing to go to work tomorrow, and the
market
will set
the wage.” So,
Republican Tom apparently wants to encourage no-bid contractors
to skin the victims for the very wages of their
recovery.
But if Democrats think they’re going to get a lot
of mileage out of the current mismanagement of hurricane
Katrina, they’ve another think coming. This mess is
a bipartisan disaster by every possible measurement. Witness
the recent Transportation Bill, a cornucopia of small minded
big plans to bring home the bacon in every congressional
district.
It’s always been that way, Katrina just makes it a
little more evident.
So now, each party quick to draw blood with their long-simmering
agendas, the Republicans hope to
- Permanently roll back the Davis-Bacon Act, written three
quarters of a century ago to require federal contractors
to pay prevailing wage
- Increase by a hundred-fold the
$2,500 limits to holders of federal credit-cards for
no-bid spending
- Expand school vouchers, using the displaced
schoolchildren from Katrina damaged cities as an excuse
- Give
money directly to faith-based groups for use as they
see fit in the dissemination of social services
(so much for the separation of faith-based
and state)
For their part, the Democrats have been quick to come back
with
- An expansion of Medicade for Katrina survivors, regardless
of income
- Expanding the use of federal rent vouchers, again
regardless of income
- A plan to drive a stake through the
heart of further tax cuts for the wealthy
And so it goes, bad legislation for all the wrong reasons
and dripping with self-interest in order to out-headline
the other party. Tom DeLay’s
spokesman was early out of the box with the statement that “the
important thing is to empower and encourage anyone who is
willing and able to help to administer emergency help.” That’s
two ‘helps’ in one sentence, which may
be dicey grammar but leaves out the most significant help of all, the helping of one’s self to a part of that $250,000
credit card limit.
Folks are just lined up to help with that.
Rep. John Dingell, a Democrat from Michigan,
jumped into the quote race with a comment about opening Medicade
to singles or childless couples.
“Would you want to
be the fellow that tells a single man or childless couple
we’re going to take care of their next-door neighbor
and we are not going to take care of them when both are wiped
out by the flood? I don’t want to be the guy that does
that.”
Apparently it’s perfectly all right to tell the single
guy or childless couple they’re out of luck if they
were wiped out by job loss or any of a number of catastrophes
unrelated to Katrina.
Not content with that unfortunate utterance, Dingell went
on to explain his motivation “is to help people
who are desperate” and to give states an incentive
to help survivors with health care “without going
broke.” It
was unclear who was going broke, the desperate people
or the state.
But there was no doubt about John’s personal
prejudice concerning which survival generates his (and his
party’s)
good will and which can go to hell, directly to hell, without
passing GO. There are more causes of desperation than
merely hurricanes, John. Lots of soon-to-be-desperate
auto workers in Michigan.
Dick Cheney said on September 10th, "There
are a lot of lessons we want to learn out of this process
in terms of what works. I think we are in fact on our way
to getting on top of the whole Katrina exercise."
Listen
for the sound of another towel being thrown in. Nearly four
years ago to the day, very nearly the same words were spoken
at the World Trade Center. The intervening time was an absolute
dead-heat in Republican and Democratic incompetence.
In both cases, the only response Congress and the administration
could muster was to finger-point and ultimately spend their
way into re-election.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |