|
January, 2005
That is it would have, if it had, but it didn’t, depending
upon who and when it was supposed to, if it did at all, which
probably isn’t likely whenever that question was appropriate
to ask.
Is that clear, Senator?
Umm, well, let’s see if this makes it easier. In the
2002 directive, signed by President Bush---the one that pledged
the humane treatment of prisoners in American custody---officers
of the CIA and other non-military personnel fell outside
the bounds of the directive. Okay, I guess that means all
those CIA case officers and all the “consultants” the
Pentagon hired to fight their war could torture whoever the
hell they wanted. Umm, yes Senator.
But of course the president is clearly opposed to torture,
clearly opposed by policy and the CIA and other nonmilitary
personnel are fully bound by that policy. That’s what
Gonzales said. So, the directive says outside the bounds
and the policy says bound, is that it, Mr. Gonzales?
Umm, yes.
Mr. Gonzales, would you define torture for us, as you understand
it?
Umm, no Senator.
Well folks, Senator Edward Kennedy got a few days reprieve
in confirming this latest embarrassment to the office of
Attorney General but it looks like it’s going to happen
on the 24th and that’s Monday. Whether that’s
a step up or down from the Ashcroft tenure is anybody’s
guess . . .
. . . but, if it waddles like a duck . . .
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |