|
October 2004
Wasn't all that long ago that Nobel Peace Prizes were
handed out to the likes of Henry Kissinger, Jimmy Carter
and Nelson Mandela. At least two out of those three are deserving
men who have done much to advance the causes of peace throughout
the world.
But they were easy choices, perhaps too easy. Already famous,
already known worldwide, and one wondered if the prize was
yet one more accolade or was founded to mean more, to be
a catalyst rather than a mantle. Surprisingly, in that context,
Ghandi never won one.
There were some strange choices as well. In 1994, Yasser
Arafat shared the prize with Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin,
a selection that may have been based more on optimism than
experience. Few people in this world have backed away from
peace more consistently than Yasser Arafat.
Year by year, the parade went by. Mother Teresa? Who could
possibly quarrel with that? Kofi Annan? Yep. So, like many
such awards, the Nobel has been up and down as it made the
obvious and not-so-obvious choices, but one way or another
they seldom raised eyebrows.
Until last year. Last year the committee chose an Iranian
woman little known outside her country, Shirin Ebadi, for
her lifelong work promoting democracy and human rights in
Iran. A lawyer, judge, lecturer, writer and activist, she
has spoken out clearly and strongly in Iran which was never
an easy or safe choice under either the Shah or ayatollahs.
Who is this woman? was the immediate question and thus
the question became the celebration, which in my mind
is a giant step up for the award.
Confirming that last year's choice was no fluke,
the committee this year selected Wangari Maathai, at age
64 one of Kenya's and Africa's first modern women.
Read up on this special woman while she's still fresh
in the news because if I get started, this column will go
to forty pages. There are of course hundreds and perhaps
thousands of people out there like Wangari, who use their
lives and risk their lives to make a difference within the
circle of their influence. They are the true internationalists,
knowing in their gut that the world must be changed first
down the street and then one town over. Last year was a home
run for the Nobel Peace Prize and this year, their first
chance to step to the plate again, they hit another.
The Nobel committees are a secretive bunch, as well they
should be, and I doubt they talk much among themselves. But
wouldn't it be wonderful if this current direction
of the Peace committee were to seep under the door at economics.
The Nobel Prize for Economics has long gone to academics,
my personal favorite being Milton Friedman in 1976. But there
are others who till in the fields of economics and some among
them who have left theory behind to raise bumper crops. Muhammad
Yunus and his Grameen Bank come immediately to mind. A Bangladeshi
economist, you can read about his astounding Bank by clicking
here and the trouble you take to learn about him will
reconstitute your faith in humanity. Not a bad bargain for
a few minutes time.
Maybe someone at the Nobel will check it out as well.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |