|
March 10, 2006
A disclaimer is in order. Let it be stipulated that I am in
no way an authority on the United States Navy, the science behind
sonar technology or the navigational systems of sea mammals such
as whales.
But hey, that's never prevented me from espousing a point of
view and now seems an inappropriate time to begin all that time-consuming
nonsense of learning the facts. This is commentary.
The Navy is looking for a site for their sailors to practice
sonar in a shallow-water environment, which sounds logical enough
and they’ve selected the waters off North Carolina, a dicey
choice.
That particular area is habitat for two groups of whales,
both the Beaked and Right whale. Right whales are endangered
already and beaked whales have proven to be particularly sensitive
to sonar.
But I guess the training has to proceed, else how are we to
protect ourselves against the thousands of North Korean and Chinese
submarines that ply our coasts? Only the Navy or Secretary Rumsfeld
would have the answer to that and it's not likely to be a high
priority while the rest of their tactical world is melting down.
Be that as it may, some 190+ words into this commentary,
I have a proposed solution. Potentially, a pretty good one.
Why
is it not possible to carry off this entire training exercise
by sonar simulator? We have flight simulators that reduce the
need for expensive flight time in commercial aircraft. Why
not apply the same logic and technology to the sensitive environment
of sea mammals?
No one can deny (according to what I’ve read) that the
Navy needs to conduct sonar training in shallow waters, where
sound propagates differently than in the deep ocean. So, who
am I to deny that? But I suspect that the ‘propagating
differently’ that sonar does in that shallow water environment
can be programmed into a computer.
I
have a friend, working for NASA, doing computer-generated Mars
simulations, so when they go there, they’ll know
what to expect. We don’t talk about it, because it doesn’t
interest me much, it’s way beyond my technical understanding
and I suppose he’s not supposed to gab about it. But if
they can simulate Mars, it seems probable they can simulate
the shallow water off North Carolina.
Give me a break. It's zaps, right? Send a zap, listen for a
zap, make sure you can tell this zap from that. Learn to tell
the Russian zap from the Korean or Chinese zap, make sure our
Navy is able to close the zap-gap.
Simulators have the further agreeable component of being able
to produce an entire Disney-World of possibilities. You want
a simulated collision, malfunction, near-miss, ghost reading,
blackout, thunderstorm, power failure or broken link in the chain-of-command,
you can have it and never so much as come to the attention of
a nearby whale.
If Donald Rumsfeld has the hiccups after a big
lunch, computers can simulate it and sailors can learn to recognize
it. Understandable language from Rummy might be beyond them,
but hiccups they can do.
You can accomplish this on a ship at sea, on land in a closed-in
cubicle or in all probability within the confines of the Starbucks
of your choice.
Unless I miss my guess, sonar isn’t something
you lean over the rail and try to hear coming back at you over
the rush of a bow-wave.
In all likelihood, it’s done at
a desk within the bowels of a submarine or perhaps even an aircraft-carrier,
by a serious looking young sailor under the pressure of a commanding
officer breathing down his neck. A slam-dunk for Justin Chatwin
in the upcoming film, “Sonar.”
Supposedly, the three sites favored by the Navy were chosen
for practical reasons: they were close to home ports, air stations
and federal shore facilities; had appropriate water depths; and
had a satisfactory climate. That last is code for the Fleet Admiral
being able to play golf nearby at his favorite club. Okay, I
admit that’s a cheap-shot. But certainly whales were not
on the to-do list.
What’s the problem with simulators, Admiral? Not salty
enough?
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |