|
June, 2005
Dear Tony,
You’ve just been re-elected to a history-making third
term as Prime Minister of Britain and you really don’t
have to lick George Bush’s boots any longer. Although
it’s too late to redefine your position supporting
the U.S. on Iraq, it’s a watershed moment in the world’s
approach to warming.
You are the Chairman of next month’s annual G-8 meeting
in Scotland. Seven of the eight member countries are agreed
on the wording of environmental standards. The lone holdout
is America and George Bush’s unreasonable behavior
toward Kyoto and the world environmental crisis.
Tell him to take a hike. There is absolutely nothing to
lose and everything to gain, including a lasting place in
history as the man who would not back away when principle
opposed financial greed and finally succeeded.
Sincerely, Jim Freeman
Juliet Eilperin’s shocking article, U.S. Pressure
Weakens G-8 Climate Plan, in Friday’s Washington Post
hammers away at the same old issue . . . that the Bush administration just
doesn’t get it. We’re finally seeing what
Dick Cheney was up to in those energy conferences he’s
refused to divulge for the past four years. Insider trading
as energy policy, what else can you call it?
No one even blinked when Phil Cooney, chief of staff of
the White House Council on Environmental Quality got
caught last week cooking the books on government climate
change
reports that were issued in 2002 and 2003. Before taking
this sensitive job, Cooney headed the climate program at
the American Petroleum Institute. Well, there’s an
impartial guy. After being fingered last week changing scientific
findings to suit himself and his president, Cooney retired
from government service. This week he announced his new job
. . . he plans to join Exxon Mobil, the world's largest oil
company, this fall. Surprise!
The wording of Cooney’s edited document will help
determine or, more accurately, help limit and obfuscate what
action the G-8 countries take as a group to combat global
warming. The members, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan
and Russia are all signatories to the Kyota Protocols and all in favor of strong language and stronger actions.
Unanimous,
but for one.
According to Eilperin’s account, one deleted section
from the G-8 working copy cited “increasingly compelling
evidence of climate change, including rising ocean and atmospheric
temperatures, retreating ice sheets and glaciers, rising
sea levels and changes to ecosystems.” Instead, U.S.
negotiators inserted a sentence reading “climate
change is a serious long term challenge that has the potential
to
affect every part of the globe.”
Long-term? Challenge? Potential? The North Pole can now
be reached by boat.
So, c’mon you Group of Eight, refuse to go along.
Then perhaps you can truly hold up your heads as a group
of eight instead of a group of seven dictated by one.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |