|
November 30, 2005
There are certainly enough claims for ‘equity’ these
days and salmon may not strike you as having a voice in the discord
that’s out there. But Congress thought they did. Admittedly,
they thought that some twenty-five years ago, a full ten years
before Larry Craig became the Senator from Idaho and set out
to erase equity as a salmon standard.
In 1980, Congress passed a law ordering that salmon in the Columbia
hydro-system receive "equitable treatment," along with
electricity generation, irrigation and barge transport. I don’t
know how exactly you measure being equitable to a salmon, but
those were days when Congress worried about such things. For
that altruistic concern, thye created the Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), the federal agency that sells power
from federal dams.
So
far, so good.
That twenty-five year ago legislation created the Fish Passage
Center, a tiny fish-science organization with just 12
employees that counts salmon in the river ecosystem, to see
how they’re doing. The power companies hate those well
meaning fish-counters because from time to time they’re
ordered to send enough water over the top of the dams to keep
salmon alive and healthy.
Water over the top doesn’t make any money.
Something like four out of five homes in the Pacific Northwest
are lighted by hydroelectric power, so the Snake and Columbia
river system is a big deal, an absolutely right direction to
have gone for power generation and a vital national asset. But
the rivers were dammed by agreement and with requirements and
salmon were part of that. An agreed part. A part that
can be lived with at relatively small cost.
Enter,
Larry Craig, Senator from Idaho, where he is the darling of the
hydroelectric power industry. The last time Larry had to defend
his seat in 2002, he piled up more money from electric utilities
than from any other industry. I don’t know if Larry fishes,
but I do know he was named "legislator of the year" by
the National Hydropower Association.
Legislator of the Year. That would be a hell of a fine
tribute, if it came from anyone other than a guy’s deepest-pocketed
contributor.
The National Hydropower Association’s “Legislator
We Most Own in Washington Award” doesn’t have
quite that nail-it-on-the-wall right there next to the picture
of me and the president aspect about it. Particularly as it
undoes Congress’ 1980 intent.
Senator
Craig’s contribution to the undoing was but a single
sentence hidden in fine print of the energy and water appropriations
bill. "The Bonneville Power Administration may make
no new obligations in support of the Fish Passage Center." Very
concise, well edited and not too wordy, Senator.
Fish and game agencies in Oregon, Washington and Idaho, Indian
tribes with fishing rights on the river and the governors of Oregon
and Washington have all said that eliminating the Fish
Passage Center is a bad idea that would reduce the quality of
information on endangered salmon. But it’s a dead issue,
because if you don’t count the fish, no one needs
to require water for the fish that aren't counted and Larry has
just made sure no one counts.
Okay, so what? The ‘so what’ is the method by which
this occurred. Craig didn’t craft that sentence (admittedly,
I speculate), the power industry did. It was cunningly tucked
in to the legislation where no one would see it. Few Senators
actually read these bills, their staffs are charged with that.
An overworked staff, a single sentence.
Bingo! Pay-back time for a fish story.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |