|
January 24, 2006
Perhaps a dozen photos of George Bush shaking hands with Jack
Abramoff exist, maybe more. The Prez may even be shown with his
arm around the guy, or in one of those back-slapping ‘tell
me that one again’ moments.
Presidential photos are a major industry. They
hang proudly on the walls of legislators, staff of legislators,
wives of staff and even the occasional lobbyist. Like probably
ten thousand of them. Among the ten thousand is Jack, the most
famous of them all, at least for the moment.
Somehow or another, the photo of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands
with Saddam Hussein never became a controversial issue, possibly,
because it was never withheld. It’s an American axiom
that if you’re not going to show me, I’ve absolutely,
positively got to see. Careers have been made on that . . . and
broken.
And so it goes, the White House once again (tiresomely) making
something out of nothing.
If they were anywhere near as good publicizing their agenda
as they are bringing critical focus to their blunders, they wouldn’t
even need Karl Rove. Dark-side Karl, the father of all this nonsense.
Mary Matalin, an informal White House adviser, said the
photos should not be released and that, if they are, voters
are savvy enough to realize the images are not evidence of a
Bush role in the scandal. Matalin, Karl Rove think-alike and
self-styled political consultant ought to know about keeping
things out of the public eye, having whisked Dick Cheney off
to various locations, all of them as undisclosed as the photos
in question.
This is an administration that thrives on the cloak and the
dagger, that perceives itself in terms of darkness and shadow.
It no doubt revels in watching old James Bond movies, the real ones that featured the real man, Sean Connery. They are, each
of them, legends in their own minds and real men. The bathroom
mirrors of Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush have in common the squint-eyed
morning poses of men of action, guys in the know, makers of history.
Until it comes to a dozen worthless photos, that have now become
the cause celebre of the opposition and front-page focus in the
nation’s newspapers. Can you imagine Bond refusing the
press? He'd toss the photos at their feet and turn to his martini,
shaken, not stirred.
This president, who cannot be stirred, is clearly shaken.
What is the White House, some kind of national kindergarden?
What silly games they continue to play. It’s been said
(with considerable truth) that Nixon could have avoided resignation
if he’d only admitted and shrugged off the Watergate break-in
as an embarrassing incident of no importance. Clinton might have
(with somewhat more personal difficulty) have acknowledged his
weakness for babes and pointed in the general direction of John
Kennedy.
But presidents seem never to learn and (more to the point) they’re
handled and advised by staff that are scared to death of
making wrong moves. So they never dare make the right ones, just diddle
around pawing the earth in denial while their president swings
in the wind.
Note to Karl Rove: Release the stupid pictures, Karl.
They’re coming out anyway. Do you guys really think, in
this day and age, that a dozen photos that are already on various
walls and desks can really be kept from the front pages?
“Yeah,” George squints at the photo and adjusts
his glasses, “I guess that’s Abramoff, if you guys
say so. Big money-man, if I remember. I back-slap a million of
those guys. Shame he got in trouble, but that’s Washington.” Big
grin.
The country would love it, but he's gonna throw it away.
Get out of the Archives and read what Jim's writing
today |